Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 257(1): 57-64, 2022 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1770831

ABSTRACT

This study sought to evaluate the effects of two vaccine doses and the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers. We measured immunoglobulin G antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid and spike protein among healthcare workers at Gunma University Hospital. In March 2021, prior to BNT-162b2 vaccination, two of 771 participants were seropositive for nucleocapsid and spike protein, whereas 768 were seronegative. The remaining one participant was seropositive for nucleocapsid protein but seronegative for spike protein. A total of 769 participants were seropositive for spike protein after two vaccination doses. The two seropositive participants prior to vaccination showed the highest antibody titers after the second vaccination. They were probably infected with SARS-CoV-2 without clinical symptoms before March 2021. Four weeks after the second vaccination, a younger age was associated with higher antibody titers against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Thirty-two weeks after the second vaccination, blood samples were collected from 342 of 769 participants. Antibody titers at 32 weeks after the second vaccination significantly decreased compared with those at 4 weeks after the second vaccination among all age groups. The rate of decrease in antibody titers between 4 and 32 weeks after the second vaccination was greater in the female participants. No sex differences were observed in the antibody titers within each age group. BNT-162b2 vaccination thus induced seroconversion in an age-dependent manner. Serological screening could further establish the likelihood of subclinical SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Immunoglobulin G , Japan/epidemiology , Nucleocapsid , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
2.
Life (Basel) ; 11(7)2021 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1302363

ABSTRACT

Background. Health and social management of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, responsible for the COVID-19 disease, requires both screening tools and diagnostic procedures. Reliable screening tests aim at identifying (truely) infectious individuals that can spread the viral infection and therefore are essential for tracing and harnessing the epidemic diffusion. Instead, diagnostic tests should supplement clinical and radiological findings, thus helping in establishing the diagnosis. Several analytical assays, mostly using RT-PCR-based technologies, have become commercially available for healthcare workers and clinical laboratories. However, such tests showed some critical limitations, given that a relevant number of both false-positive and false-negative cases have been so far reported. Moreover, those analytical techniques demonstrated to be significantly influenced by pre-analytical biases, while the sensitivity showed a dramatic time dependency. Aim. Herein, we critically investigate limits and perspectives of currently available RT-PCR techniques, especially when referring to the required performances in providing reliable epidemiological and clinical information. Key Concepts. Current data cast doubt on the use of RT-PCR swabs as a screening procedure for tracing the evolution of the current SARS-COV-2 pandemic. Indeed, the huge number of both false-positive and false-negative results deprives the trustworthiness of decision making based on those data. Therefore, we should refine current available analytical tests to quickly identify individuals able to really transmit the virus, with the aim to control and prevent large outbreaks.

3.
Journal of Clinical Laboratory Medicine ; 64(9):1026-1033, 2020.
Article in Japanese | ISHO-JP | ID: covidwho-745295
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL